Trends in Ecology & Evolution
ReviewInferring biotic interactions from proxies
Section snippets
Why infer interactions?
Even if serious gaps in knowledge of biodiversity remain, much progress has been made in determining how many different types of organisms exist (the Linnaean shortfall [1]), what evolutionary relationships connect different lineages to a common ancestor (the Darwinian shortfall [2]), and where different species are distributed (the Wallacean shortfall [3]). Much less is known about the types of interactions that exist among species (the Eltonian shortfall [4]) and the importance of such
Which interactions to infer?
There are many different ways to describe a biotic interaction. Interactions may vary in their type (e.g., antagonistic or facilitative), their strength (e.g., weak or strong interactions), or their symmetry (e.g., symmetric or asymmetric). An important step for inferring biotic interactions is to determine what information is to be inferred. We propose building interaction networks bottom-up, in other words predicting the links among species and then exploring the collective properties of the
The proxies used in inference
When direct information about biotic interactions is unavailable, we must resort to indirect information or proxies to obtain insight about them. Three classes of proxies can help with inferring interactions between species: traits, phylogenies, and geographical data (for a review of examples see Table 1). Traits are usually defined as morphological, physiological, phenological, or behavioral characteristics of species that directly impact on their fitness [25]. However, they are also expected
Testing inferences about interactions
The usefulness of a theoretical model is partly dependent on it being successfully tested. However, inferences of biotic interactions by models are not easily tested because reliable data on absence of interactions are generally unavailable. Similar problems exist in the literature on modeling species distributions 4, 55, with the consequence that inferences of interactions must necessarily be interpreted as potential rather than realized. Indeed, observed interactions will typically constitute
Concluding remarks
We have proposed a framework for inferring biotic interactions based on stepwise removal of forbidden links and calculation of the probabilities of interaction for the remaining links. With such a process one is able to establish the backbone of an interactions network occurring in a given regional species pool. The pruning of the network is made using rules derived from the analysis of functional traits, phylogenies, and geographical proxies. To provide an illustration we implemented the
Acknowledgments
We thank Natalia Melo for support with the design of the artwork. Research by I.M-C., M.G.M., and M.B.A. was supported through the Integrated Program of Investigação Cientifica e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (IC&DT) (1/SAESCTN/ALENT-07-0224-FEDER-001755). I.M-C., is currently funded by the Fonds de Recherches du Québec – Nature et Technologies (FQRNT) programme. M.G.M. also acknowledges support by a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship within the 7th European Commission Framework Programme
References (81)
Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2013)Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2006)A framework for community interactions under climate change
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2010)Ecological networks in a changing climate
- et al.
Biogeography
(1998) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect
Divers. Distrib.
(2005)Ecological Niches and Geographical Distributions
(2011)- et al.
Redefining the community: a species-based approach
Oikos
(2006) - et al.
Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?
Global Ecol. Biogeogr.
(2003) The Red Queen and the Court Jester: species diversity and the role of biotic and abiotic factors through time
Science
(2009)
From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis
The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change
Global Ecol. Biogeogr.
Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales
Global Ecol. Biogeogr.
Biotic interactions influence the projected distribution of a specialist mammal under climate change. Diversity and Distributions
Macroecological signals of species interactions in the Danish avifauna
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Using species co-occurrence networks to assess the impacts of climate change
Ecography
Climate change, biotic interactions and ecosystem services
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
Disentangling the web of life
Science
Artifacts or attributes? Effects of resolution on the Little Rock Lake food web
Ecol. Monogr.
Beyond species: why ecological interactions vary through space and time
Oikos
The geographic scaling of biotic interactions
Ecography
Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength
Ecology
Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance
Science
Estimates and tests of per capita interaction strength: diet, abundance, and impact of intertidally foraging birds
Ecol. Monogr.
Calculation of nitrogen mineralization in soil food webs
Plant Soil
Let the concept of trait be functional!
Oikos
Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives
Biol. Rev.
More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs
Ecol. Lett.
Networks: An Introduction
The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
Spatial guilds in the Serengeti food web revealed by a Bayesian group model
PLoS Comp. Biol.
Detailed food web networks of three Greater Antillean coral reef systems: the Cayman Islands, Cuba, and Jamaica
Dataset Papers Ecol.
The dimensionality of ecological networks
Ecol. Lett.
Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages
Nature
Apparent competition and enemy-free space of insect host-parasitoid communities
Am. Nat.
What determines the strength of a trophic cascade?
Ecology
A mechanistic approach for modeling temperature-dependent consumer resource dynamics
Am. Nat.
The dissimilarity of species interaction networks
Ecol. Lett.
Genotype matching in a parasitoid–host genotypic food web: an approach for measuring effects of environmental change
Mol. Ecol.
Cited by (243)
Uncovering microbial food webs using machine learning
2023, Soil Biology and BiochemistryAnalyzing trophic ecosystem functions with the interaction functional space
2023, Trends in Ecology and EvolutionA roadmap for biomonitoring in the 21st century: Merging methods into metrics via ecological networks
2023, Advances in Ecological ResearchEcological network analysis reveals complex responses of tree species life stage interactions to stand variables
2024, Journal of Forestry Research