Trends in Ecology & Evolution
ReviewUnder the radar: mitigating enigmatic ecological impacts
Section snippets
The problem of enigmatic ecological impacts
There is increasing recognition of the need to find ways to reduce the environmental impact of human development (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). This has led to a proliferation of approaches to evaluate, manage, mitigate, and offset the ecological impacts of developments. Evaluations of ecological impact, such as environmental impact assessments, biodiversity offset calculations, and conservation or land-use plans, are generally intended to account for the full range of foreseeable ecological impacts of
Four categories of enigmatic impact
Our framework identifies four categories of impact that are often overlooked or inadequately addressed in impact evaluations: (i) cumulative; (ii) offsite; (iii) cryptic; and (iv) secondary impacts. Interactions between multiple impacts may also be overlooked. These categories, named after the reasons for which the impacts are excluded from impact evaluations, act as a checklist for scoping the various ‘enigmatic’ impacts that could result from a development or series of developments. As such,
Impact synergies
For every pair of impacts, there are possible synergies that exacerbate environmental damage. The combined effect of the two impacts could be greater than their sum, or one phenomenon might facilitate another. For example, the synergistic effects of multiple species extinctions on ecosystem function are often greater than the additive effect of each extinction, were it to occur in isolation; also, forest fragmentation can facilitate fires 44, 46. It is difficult to predict interactions between
Challenges and opportunities
Evaluating impacts is the first step to mitigating them. Some impacts are overlooked because they are difficult to detect, quantify, and attribute. In other cases, ignoring them may simply be convenient or politically expedient from a development perspective (e.g., 12, 49).
The difficulty of accounting for enigmatic impacts is not the only hurdle to achieving credible impact evaluations. The effectiveness of many impact evaluations can be undermined by a suite of political and economic
Concluding remarks
Accounting for and mitigating the full breadth of enigmatic impacts resulting from developments is ambitious but important for preventing the continued degradation of ecosystems and the biodiversity, ecological processes, and services that they support. While this may be difficult to achieve comprehensively, significant advances can be made by improving existing mechanisms and developing new ones, to account for the cumulative, offsite, cryptic, and secondary impacts of developments and their
Acknowledgements
We thank B. Laurance, H. Murphy, M. Maron and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on previous versions of this manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Gledden Postgraduate Scholarship, The Wilderness Society, the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, the National Environmental Research Program's Environmental Decisions Hub and the Great Western Woodlands Supersite, part of Australia's Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network.
References (79)
Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
(2005)- et al.
Mechanisms for the inclusion of cumulative impacts in conservation decision-making are sensitive to vulnerability and irreplaceability in a stochastically simulated landscape
J. Nat. Conserv.
(2014) Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
(2013)A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
(2008)Appraisal of environmental impacts and mitigation measures through mathematical matrices
J. Environ. Manage.
(1998)- et al.
Assessing the cumulative effects of projects using geographic information systems
Environ. Impact Asses.
(2011) Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies
Biol. Conserv.
(2012)Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2009)- et al.
Cumulative effects assessment: does scale matter?
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
(2007) Climate shocks that come out of the blue
New Sci.
(2008)
Physical environment of the Gulf relevant to marine pollution: an overview
Mar. Poll. Bull.
Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: regional and global analyses
Glob. Environ. Change
Effect of ambient air pollution on cone, seed and pollen characteristics in eastern white and red pines
Environ. Pollut.
What we know and don’t know about Earth's missing biodiversity
Trends Ecol. Evol.
A review of the status of forest elephants Loxodonta africana in central Africa
Biol. Conserv.
Wilderness and biodiversity
J. Nat. Conserv.
Integrating accessibility and intactness into large-area conservation planning in the Canadian boreal forest
Biol. Conserv.
A collaborative approach to address the cumulative impacts of mine-water discharge: negotiating a cross-sectoral waterway partnership in the Bowen Basin
Aust. Resour. Policy
Biodiversity Offsets: Views, Experience, and the Business Case
Development by Design: Cooperative Mitigation Planning for Barrick Gold's Kanowna Belle Operations in Western Australia
Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art
Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal
Saga of the short range endemic
Aust. J. Entomol.
Why bartering biodiversity fails
Conserv. Lett.
Cryptic loss of India's native forests
Science
Death by a thousand cuts: the impacts of in situ oil sands development on Alberta's boreal forest
Species extinction in the marine environment: Tasmania as a regional example of overlooked losses in biodiversity
Conserv. Biol.
Underestimation of extinction threat to stream-dwelling amphibians due to lack of consideration of narrow area of occupancy
Conserv. Biol.
Regime shift indicators fail under noise levels commonly observed in ecological systems
Ecol. Appl.
Linking habitat suitability and road mortalities across geographic ranges
Landscape Ecol.
The overlooked terrestrial impacts of mountaintop mining
Bioscience
Detection of environmental impacts: natural variability, effect size, and power analysis
Ecol. Appl.
Consideration of offsite impacts in targeting soil conservation programs
Land Econ.
State of practice of cumulative effects assessment and management: the good, the bad and the ugly
Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal
The tyranny of small decisions: market failures, imperfections, and the limits of economics
Kyklos
Deforestation: carving up the Amazon
Nature
Road Ecology: Science and Solutions
Quiet, nonconsumptive recreation reduces protected area effectiveness
Conserv. Lett.
Petroleum hydrocarbons in fish from the Arabian Gulf
Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
Ecology and environmental impact assessment
J. Appl. Ecol.
Cited by (64)
COVID-19's environmental impacts: Challenges and implications for the future
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentLand use effects on plant invasion, plant communities and soil properties in Southwestern Nigeria
2023, Acta Ecologica SinicaCitation Excerpt :and, in some cases, single-handedly contributing to the decline of rare and threatened species in ecosystems across the region [17,23]. Through indirect and cumulative processes, ecosystem and region-wide effects on biodiversity arise [42] ([13,15,47] [3,29];). There is little attention on the effects of these processes and consequences on biological diversity status.
How big is the footprint? Quantifying offsite effects of mines on boreal plant communities
2023, Global Ecology and ConservationGuidelines for selecting an appropriate currency in biodiversity offset transactions
2022, Journal of Environmental ManagementConsidering counterfactual scenarios in conservation planning: Perspectives from a biodiverse mining area in the Atlantic Forest
2022, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation