Systematic reviewA review of searcher efficiency and carcass persistence in infrastructure-driven mortality assessment studies
Introduction
The human footprint is rapidly growing worldwide, with few places on Earth not affected by the vast network of linear infrastructure and its associated impacts (Loss et al., 2015; Ibisch et al., 2016). Several authors have highlighted the mortality of wildlife species, from elephants to invertebrates, caused by roads and railways (van der Ree et al., 2015; Borda-de-Água et al., 2017), or by collision and electrocution with power-lines (Lehman et al., 2007; Loss et al., 2015; Bernardino et al., 2018; D'Amico et al., 2018). The recent development of wind-farms also poses an important source of mortality for birds and bats (Kunz et al., 2007; Marques et al., 2014). Additionally, collisions with other human structures like communication towers, windows or fences also cause wildlife fatalities (Stevens and Dennis, 2013; Loss et al., 2015). However, great uncertainty exists about the impact of this mortality on the population viability of the affected species, a key question from an ecological perspective (Loss et al., 2015; Barrientos and Borda-de-Água, 2017).
Surveys of dead animals have been widely used to estimate fatality rates caused by infrastructures (e.g. Barrientos et al., 2012; Stevens and Dennis, 2013; D'Amico et al., 2015; Ascensão et al., 2017). The number of carcasses found during surveys is an underestimated measure of the true mortality rate, as it is affected by two major biases: the overlooking of carcasses, the probability of a researcher not finding a carcass present in the field; and carcass disappearance, the probability of a carcass disappearing before being counted due to removal by scavengers or other means. These are the two most important biases because they can affect mortality estimates for all infrastructure types, and therefore have been the subject of numerous studies. To a lesser extent, habitat is another bias accounted for but this lacks comparability among studies. Finally, crippling bias might be considerable for certain infrastructure like power-lines, but this has rarely been quantified (but see Savereno et al., 1996; Bevanger and Brøseth, 2004; Murphy et al., 2016). Adequate quantification of biases is needed to better evaluate the impact of roads (Beckmann and Shine, 2015; Skórka, 2016), railways (Barrientos et al., 2017), power-lines (Ponce et al., 2010), and wind-farms (Kunz et al., 2007; Smallwood, 2007, Smallwood, 2013; Arnett et al., 2008) on wildlife. This is not a trivial matter, as the better these estimations are, the better we will be able to identify impacted species, locate mortality hotspots, implement adequate mitigation measures (Barrientos et al., 2011; van der Ree et al., 2015), and parameterize the fraction of mortality associated with human-related causes to forecast its impact on population viability (Hels and Buchwald, 2001; van der Ree et al., 2009; Borda-de-Água et al., 2014). Some authors have argued for more scientifically sound, peer-reviewed research on these biases to develop carcass-monitoring protocols that include fewer, smaller biases (Kunz et al., 2007; Smallwood, 2007, Smallwood, 2013). This reflects the growing interest of both scientists and practitioners in this topic, with an increasing amount of literature available. Nevertheless, despite the existence of some specific protocols, such as those from the American National Wind Coordinating Collaborative (NWCC) (Anderson et al., 1999; Strickland et al., 2011), there is a lack of broadly applicable guidelines to minimize biases in mortality estimates in field trials.
In this study, we performed an analytic review of the main variables affecting the two most important biases in studies which aimed to correct mortality estimators associated with human infrastructures. First, we reviewed studies that quantified overlooked carcass bias by assessing the searcher efficiency rate (the percentage of carcasses found by the searchers), by placing trial carcasses and calculating the proportion of them found by uninformed surveyors. Second, we reviewed studies that estimated carcass disappearance bias by estimating carcass persistence rate (percentage of carcasses that persisted) by placing trial carcasses and monitoring their persistence in the field for a specified period of time. We focused on these approaches because they are the most commonly employed in the literature, although other methods like mark-recapture have been used as well. Corrections taking these biases into account aim to adjust the number of carcasses found during surveys in order to estimate the actual number of fatalities, which is key to understanding the population-level impacts on wildlife associated with human infrastructure. Despite the fact that these trials are a common component of monitoring programs for some types of infrastructure, like wind-farms or power-lines, they are scarce or absent in others, like road or railway studies (van der Ree et al., 2015; Barrientos et al., 2017). Furthermore, methodological details are highly variable among studies. This is the case, for instance, with the sampling interval between searches, the number of replicates per study area, and the origin (e.g. domestic vs. wild) or condition (e.g. fresh vs. defrosted) of carcasses (Arnett et al., 2008; Smallwood, 2007, Smallwood, 2013). Additionally, the reliability of the correction estimates is often compromised by limitations of time and financial resources, leading to trials with insufficient sample sizes that limit applicability (Arnett et al., 2008; Smallwood, 2013). This can lead to simplistic assumptions in study designs (e.g. a lack of testing of potential taxon-related differences), to discordant results, or even to misleading findings (Arnett et al., 2008; Smallwood, 2007, Smallwood, 2013). To explore the drivers of searcher efficiency and carcass persistence rates we carried out a systematic review, with the additional novelty that we used the trial sample size to weight the importance of every single trial. This approach lends more importance to the patterns found in those experiments with larger sample sizes, thus avoiding spurious conclusions.
Specifically, we aimed to address the following hypotheses, based on previous research: for searcher efficiency trials, we expected that: i) dogs perform better than humans (e.g. Paula et al., 2011; Reyes et al., 2016); ii) searcher efficiency varies among habitats and seasons (Arnett et al., 2008); iii) detectability increases with searcher experience (Ponce et al., 2010); and iv) larger carcasses are detected at higher rates (reviewed for birds at wind-farms in Smallwood, 2007). For carcass persistence trials, we expected that: v) larger carcasses persist at higher rates (Smallwood, 2007); vi) fresh carcasses are removed at higher rates than thawed ones (see Kerns et al., 2005 for bats); vii) mammals are removed more rapidly than birds (Kerns et al., 2005); and viii) carcasses from wild specimens are removed at a different rate than those of domestic specimens (Prosser et al., 2008; Urquhart et al., 2015). These are the most common factors addressed in the literature to date, and are testable with the dataset available. However, it is worth mentioning that other, and perhaps a minority of, hypotheses were not studied here: density of carcasses and scavenger swamping is mainly related to wind-farm studies (reviewed in Smallwood, 2007); carcass colour is not specified in several studies, and we could not test it; very few studies tested whether searchers were aware of the trial; and road traffic flow is only applied to road-related studies (see below). Based on evaluations of our selected hypotheses, we aimed to set recommendations for future trials.
Section snippets
Data collection
We searched ISI Web of Science in October 2016 for experiments that corrected mortality estimates to obtain a set of papers potentially useful for our review, using a combination of the terms ‘carcass’, ‘trial’, and ‘searching’. We carried out a similar search in Google Scholar™, which also includes reports and other sources. Whereas the inclusion of reports does not bias analytical reviews (Barrientos et al., 2011), they notably increased the number of studies potentially useful for review.
Searcher efficiency rate
A total of 275 experiments, from 59 studies, totaling 8358 carcasses met our selection criteria (Table S3). Only two models had ΔAICc < 10 (Table 1), both containing agent and body mass (Σwi = 1.00 in both cases). The larger the carcass size, the higher the searcher efficiency (Fig. 1). Searcher efficiency was higher for dogs compared to humans, particularly for smaller carcass sizes (Fig. 1). Habitat was less influential (Σwi = 0.19). Values for the mean ± standard errors of the variables
Discussion
Both searcher efficiency and persistence rates were affected by several variables, implying that future trials must be carefully planned to consider these factors. The results from our review have a strong cautionary message against the establishment of protocols based on a few studies, with low sample sizes, or without controlling for potential confounding variables, as some paradigms assumed to date are rejected by the data from our analytical review.
Summary and suggestions for future research
Our results show that several study-specific factors prevent the extrapolation of searcher efficiency and carcass persistence rates, making it necessary to carry out study-specific trials. However, some patterns arise, leading to the following conclusions:
- 1)
For both searcher efficiency and carcass persistence trials, body mass of trial carcasses should, as accurately as possible, reflect those of the target species. We included within the same category those species with less than a four-fold
Funding
This work was financed by Infraestructuras de Portugal through Infraestruturas de Portugal Biodiversity Chair (02035004). LBA, FA and RB were funded by Infraestruturas de Portugal Biodiversity Chair. RB is funded by Universidad de Alcalá, with a postdoctoral of the own plan. LBA was also funded by FEDER funds through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness Factors - COMPETE, by National Funds through FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology under the UID/BIA/50027/2013,
References (63)
- et al.
Bird collisions with power lines: state of the art and priority areas for research
Biol. Conserv.
(2018) - et al.
Modelling the impact of road mortality on barn owl (Tyto alba) populations using age-structured models
Ecol. Model.
(2014) - et al.
Vertebrate road-kill patterns in Mediterranean habitats: who, when and where
Biol. Conserv.
(2015) - et al.
The effect of road kills on amphibian populations
Biol. Conserv.
(2001) - et al.
The state of the art in raptor electrocution research: a global review
Biol. Conserv.
(2007) - et al.
Understanding bird collisions at wind farms: an updated review on the causes and possible mitigation strategies
Biol. Conserv.
(2014) - et al.
Dogs as a tool to improve bird-strike mortality estimates at wind farms
J. Nat. Conserv.
(2011) - et al.
Rate of removal of bird carcasses in arable farmland by predators and scavengers
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
(2008) The detectability and persistence of road-killed butterflies: an experimental study
Biol. Conserv.
(2016)- et al.
Vertebrate road mortality estimates: effects of sampling methods and carcass removal
Biol. Conserv.
(2013)
Studying Wind Energy/Bird Interactions: A Guidance Document
A preliminary evaluation on the use of dogs to recover bat fatalities at wind energy facilities
Wildl. Soc. Bull.
Patterns of bat fatalities at wind energy facilities in North America
J. Wildl. Manag.
Spatial patterns of road mortality of medium-large mammals in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
Wildl. Res.
Songbird carcasses disappear rapidly from agricultural fields
Auk
Railways as barriers for wildlife: current knowledge
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of marked wire in reducing avian collisions with power lines
Conserv. Biol.
Wire marking results in a small but significant reduction in avian mortality at power lines: a BACI designed study
PLoS One
What's next? Railway ecology in the 21st century
MuMIn: Multi-model Inference. R Package Version 1.10.5
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
J. Stat. Softw.
Do the numbers and locations of road-killed anuran carcasses accurately reflect impacts of vehicular traffic?
J. Wildl. Manag.
Using scent detection dogs in conservation settings: a review of scientific literature regarding their selection
Front. Vet. Sci.
Estimating bird and bat fatality at wind farms: a practical overview of estimators, their assumptions and limitations
N. Z. J. Zool.
Estimating bird mortality caused by collision with power lines and electrocution, a review of methodology
Impact of power lines on bird mortality in a subalpine area
Biodivers. Conserv.
Railway Ecology
Model Selection and Multimodel Inference
Bird on the wire: landscape planning considering costs and benefits for bird populations coexisting with power lines
Ambio. A J. Hum. Environ.
Stateline Wind Project Wildlife Monitoring Final Report, July 2001 – December 2003. Technical report peer-reviewed by and submitted to FPL Energy, the Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council, and the Stateline Technical Advisory Committee
Estimating carcass persistence and scavenging bias in a human-influenced landscape in western Alaska
J. Field Ornithol.
Cited by (67)
Monitoring carcass persistence in windfarms: Recommendations for estimating mortality
2024, Biological ConservationTraffic and weather influence on small wildlife carcass persistence time on roads
2024, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and EnvironmentIs there a spatial match between roadkill and mitigation measures identified by functional connectivity modeling?
2023, Journal for Nature ConservationEcological and methodological drivers of persistence and detection of bird fatalities at power lines: Insights from multi-project monitoring data
2022, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewCitation Excerpt :Second, the majority of the studies is only available in the native language of the country where it took place, which undermines their identification via web search engines (typically using English search-terms) and/or interpretation by non-native speakers (Amano et al., 2016; Fernández-Bellon, 2020). Third, data extraction and integration is often constrained by the variety of experimental designs and methods used in the trials, and/or by incomplete reporting of the methods and results (Barrientos et al., 2018; Bernardino et al., 2019). However, the combined analysis of data from multiple projects can contribute for a broader and more robust understanding of the ecological and methodological drivers of CP and SE biases.
Better utilisation and transparency of bird data collected by powerline companies
2022, Journal of Environmental Management
- 1
Current address: University of Alcalá, Carretera Madrid-Barcelona km. 33.6, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
- 2
Current address: IDAEA-CSIC, C/ Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.