Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031Get rights and content

Abstract

Habitat loss and fragmentation are among the largest threats to amphibian populations. However, most studies have not provided clear insights into their population-level implications. There is a critical need to investigate the mechanisms that underlie patterns of distribution and abundance. In order to understand the population- and species-level implications of habitat loss and fragmentation, it is necessary to move from site-specific inferences to assessments of how the influences of multiple factors interact across extensive landscapes to influence population size and population connectivity. The goal of this paper is to summarize the state of knowledge, identify information gaps and suggest research approaches to provide reliable knowledge and effective conservation of amphibians in landscapes experiencing habitat loss and fragmentation. Reliable inferences require attention to species-specific ecological characteristics and their interactions with environmental conditions at a range of spatial scales. Habitat connectivity appears to play a key role in regional viability of amphibian populations. In amphibians, population connectivity is predominantly effected through juvenile dispersal. The preponderance of evidence suggests that the short-term impact of habitat loss and fragmentation increases with dispersal ability. However, species with limited dispersal abilities are likely to be equally imperiled by habitat loss and fragmentation over longer time periods. Rigorous understanding of the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians will require species-specific, multi-scale, mechanistic investigations, and will be benefit from integrating large empirical field studies with molecular genetics and simulation modeling. Molecular genetic methods are particularly suited to quantifying the influences of habitat structure across large spatial extents on gene flow and population connectivity. Conservation strategies would benefit by moving from generalizations to species and process specific recommendations and by moving from site-specific actions to implementing conservation plans at multiple scales across broad landscapes.

Introduction

Earth is facing the largest mass extinction in 65 million years (Lawton and May, 1995, Vitousek et al., 1997, Wilson, 1999, Myers and Knoll, 2001, Balmford et al., 2003). Current global extinction rates for animals and plants are estimated to be up to 1000 times higher than the background rate in the fossil record (Wilson, 1999, Baillie et al., 2004). Vertebrate animal taxa are disappearing at disproportionately high rates, and amphibians are the group with the highest proportion of species threatened with extinction (Stuart et al., 2004, Beebee and Griffiths, 2005). The 2004 IUCN red list of threatened and endangered species identifies one in three of the world’s amphibian species as threatened with extinction (Baillie et al., 2004).

The apparent vulnerability of amphibians (Pechmann et al., 1991, Houlahan et al., 2000, Kiesecker et al., 2001, Baillie et al., 2004) may be due to a complex of factors, including: (1) relatively low vagilities, which amplifies the effects of habitat fragmentation (Sinsch, 1990, Gibbs, 1998, deMaynadier and Hunter, 2000, Bowne and Bowers, 2004), (2) high vulnerability to death when moving across roads and through inhospitable terrain, which depresses population growth rates (Fahrig et al., 1995, Carr and Fahrig, 2001, Carr et al., 2002), (3) often narrow habitat tolerances, which exacerbates the effects of habitat loss, degradation, and edge effects (Findlay and Houlahan, 1997, Semlitsch, 2000, Houlahan and Findlay, 2003), and (4) high vulnerability to pathogens, invasive species, climate change, increased ultraviolate-B exposure and environmental pollution (Pounds et al., 1999, Broomhall et al., 2000, Kiesecker et al., 2001, Blaustein et al., 2000, Hecnar, 1995, Bridges and Semlitsch, 2000, Davidson et al., 2001, Stuart et al., 2004).

Habitat loss and fragmentation contribute directly to most of these threats (Carr and Fahrig, 2001, Bowne and Bowers, 2004, Houlahan and Findlay, 2003). Recent research has provided information on the relationships between certain amphibians and certain attributes of habitat loss and fragmentation, and has clearly implicated the effects of habitat fragmentation on juvenile dispersal as one of the key issues in the conservation of pond breeding amphibians (Sjögren, 1991, Sinsch, 1992, Sjögren-Gulve, 1994, Vos and Chardon, 1998). However, most studies of the influences of habitat loss, fragmentation, or related mortality risks have not provided clear insights into the population-level implications of these impacts (Carr et al., 2002). There is a clear need for studies that focus on the mechanisms that drive patterns of distribution and abundance (Marsh and Trenham, 2001, Bowne and Bowers, 2004).

In order to understand the population-level implications of habitat loss and fragmentation, it is necessary to move from site-specific inferences to assessments of how multiple factors interact across large spatial extents to influence population size and population connectivity (Ruggiero et al., 1994, McGarigal and Cushman, 2002, Bowne and Bowers, 2004). Non-spatial studies conducted at local scales do not provide a basis for inferences at the landscape or regional level (McGarigal and Cushman, 2002). There is often a gross mismatch between the scale of ecological research and population-level responses (Kareiva and Anderson, 1988, Ruggiero et al., 1994). For example, correlations between organism abundance and the area of various landcover types within a certain distance of a breeding pond does not provide information necessary to infer how habitat patterns interact with the spatial distribution of breeding ponds to influence distribution and abundance. Landscape-level studies that represent the spatial patterns of the environment in a manner relevant to the organisms of question, and that address species-specific movement and abundance characteristics are essential to extend fine-scale species environment relationships to the population-level (McGarigal and Cushman, 2002).

The overall goal of this paper is to summarize the state of knowledge, identify information gaps and suggest approaches to provide reliable knowledge and effective conservation of amphibians in landscapes experiencing habitat loss and fragmentation. The paper is divided into four major components. The first is a review of current knowledge about relationships between habitat loss and fragmentation and pond-breeding amphibian populations at landscape and regional scales. Using this review as context, the second section identifies some important information gaps and research needs. Next, I propose several research approaches that may be effective at filling these information gaps. Then, I suggest several ideas to link research more effectively to conservation, and suggest interim conservation strategies.

Section snippets

Habitat area in uplands

Relatively few landscape-level studies of amphibian density and movement have been conducted (Houlahan et al., 2000, McGarigal and Cushman, 2002). Most existing studies have focused on relationships between forest cover and species occurrence. These have shown positive relationships between amphibian populations and area of forest in the surrounding landscape (Dupuis and Steventon, 1999, Knutson et al., 1999, Guerry and Hunter, 2002, Houlahan et al., 2000, Trenham and Shaffer, 2005), and

Lack of species-level information

Despite these generalizations, there are several obstacles that must be overcome before scientists will be able to reliably predict population-level responses of specific species to changes in habitat area or isolation. In most parts of world, there is very limited knowledge of the species–environment relationships of amphibians, their responses to habitat loss and fragmentation and the factors controlling population connectivity (Hazell, 2003). Knowledge is still quite rudimentary about the

Importance of species-specific, multi-scale, mechanistic investigations

Survival of amphibian populations in fragmented landscapes depends on the interaction between the pattern of roads, landcover types, the distribution of breeding ponds, the population sizes in those ponds and the dispersal characteristics of the species (Fahrig, 1998, Carr and Fahrig, 2001). For example, Porej et al. (2004) emphasize the importance of considering scaling differences among species and the structure of the landscape mosaic when investigating thresholds and minimum patch sizes.

Empirical approaches

There are at least four major ways that one could empirically test relationships between the presence or movement of a particular species and environmental structure at the landscape-level. First, one could conduct large-scale, correlative studies of distribution in relation to habitat composition and configuration at a range of scales (Hecnar and M’Closkey, 1996, Knutson et al., 1999, Kolozsvary and Swihart, 1999, Vallan, 2000, Guerry and Hunter, 2002, Weyrauch and Grubb, 2004). Such studies,

From general to specific

A number of researchers have proposed generalized conclusions and conservation recommendations based on the observation that forest habitat area, habitat connectivity and road density are related to population persistence and population connectivity. These generalizations include that the effects of adjacent land use on amphibians can extend over large distances (Houlahan and Findlay, 2003), and that the proximity and area of upland/breeding habitat play a key role in determining occupancy (

Summary

  • Habitat loss and fragmentation are among the largest threats to amphibian populations.

  • The extent, pattern and quality of terrestrial habitat in landscape mosaics are as important for many species as the quality of breeding sites.

  • Many species of amphibians appear vulnerable to both the loss and fragmentation of nonbreeding upland habitat.

  • Population connectivity appears to be a key to regional viability, and is primarily effected through juvenile dispersal.

  • In fragmented landscapes, dispersal

Acknowledgements

Support for this work was provided by US Department of Education Graduate Assistantships in Areas of National Need fellowship, the Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Program and Department of Natural Resources Conservation at the University of Massachusetts, and the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, RWU 4201.

References (102)

  • R.A. Alford et al.

    Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

    (1999)
  • J.E.M. Baillie et al.

    IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. A Global Species Assessment

    (2004)
  • A. Balmford et al.

    Measuring the changing state of nature

    Trends in Ecology and Evolution

    (2003)
  • T.J.C. Beebee et al.

    The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology?

    Biological Conservation

    (2005)
  • K.A. Berven et al.

    Dispersal in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure

    Evolution

    (1990)
  • A.R. Blaustein et al.

    Effects of ultraviolet radiation on locomotion and orientation in roughskin newts (Taricha granulosa)

    Ethology

    (2000)
  • D.R. Bowne et al.

    Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review

    Landscape Ecology

    (2004)
  • F. Breden

    The effect of post-metamorphic dispersal on the population genetic structure of fowler’s toad, Bufo woodhousei fowleri

    Copeia

    (1987)
  • C.M. Bridges et al.

    Variation in pesticide tolerance of tadpoles among and within species of Ranidae and patterns of amphibian decline

    Conservation Biology

    (2000)
  • S.D. Broomhall et al.

    Comparative effects of ambient ultraviolet-B radiation on two sympatric species of Australian frogs

    Conservation Biology

    (2000)
  • J.H. Brown et al.

    Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction

    Ecology

    (1977)
  • J.B. Bulger et al.

    Terrestrial activity and conservation of adult California red-legged frogs Rana aurora draytonii in coastal forests and grasslands

    Biological Conservation

    (2003)
  • L.W. Carr et al.

    Effect of road traffic on two amphibian species of different vagility

    Conservation Biology

    (2001)
  • L.W. Carr et al.

    Impacts of landscape transformation by roads

  • J.M.R. Curtis et al.

    The genetic structure of coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in a managed forest

    Biological Conservation

    (2004)
  • S.A. Cushman et al.

    Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships

    Landscape Ecology

    (2003)
  • S.A. Cushman et al.

    Hierarchical analysis of forest bird species-environment relationships in the Oregon Coast Range

    Ecological Applications

    (2004)
  • C. Davidson et al.

    Declines of the California red-legged frog: climate, UV-B, habitat, and pesticides hypotheses

    Ecological Applications

    (2001)
  • P.R. Delis et al.

    Decline of some west-central Florida anuran populations in response to habitat degradation

    Biodiversity and Conservation

    (1996)
  • P.G. deMaynadier et al.

    Effects of silvicultural edges on distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine

    Conservation Biology

    (1998)
  • P.G. deMaynadier et al.

    Forest canopy closure and juvenile emigration by pool-breeding amphibians in Maine

    Journal of Wildlife Management

    (1999)
  • P.G. deMaynadier et al.

    Road effects on amphibian movements in a forested landscape

    Natural Areas Journal

    (2000)
  • C.K. Dodd et al.

    Movement patterns and the conservation of amphibians breeding in small, temporary wetlands

    Conservation Biology

    (1998)
  • M.E. Douglas et al.

    A comparative study of topographical orientation in Ambystoma (Amphibia:Caudata)

    Copeia

    (1981)
  • L.A. Dupuis et al.

    Riparian management and the tailed frog in northern coastal forests

    Forest Ecology and Management

    (1999)
  • Edenhamn, P., 1996. Spatial dynamics of the European tree frog (Hyla arborea L.) in a heterogeneous landscape....
  • L. Fahrig

    When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival?

    Ecological Modelling

    (1998)
  • L. Fahrig

    How much habitat is enough?

    Biological Conservation

    (2001)
  • L. Fahrig

    Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity

    Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics

    (2003)
  • L. Fahrig et al.

    Effect of road traffic on amphibian density

    Biological Conservation

    (1995)
  • C.S. Findlay et al.

    Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands

    Conservation Biology

    (1997)
  • D.C. Forester et al.

    Age structure in a population of red-spotted newts from the Allegheny plateau of Maryland

    Journal of Herpetology

    (1991)
  • W.C. Funk et al.

    Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape

    Molecular Ecology

    (2005)
  • J.P. Gibbs

    Amphibian movements in response to forest edges, roads, and streambeds in southern New England

    Journal of Wildlife Management

    (1998)
  • D.E. Gill

    The metapopulation ecology of the red-spotted newt, Notophthalmus viridenscens (Rafinesque)

    Ecological Monographs

    (1978)
  • J. Grand et al.

    A multiple-scale analysis of species-habitat relationships: breeding birds in a pitch pine-scrub oak (Pinus rigida-Quercus ilicifolia) community

    Biological Conservation.

    (2003)
  • A.D. Guerry et al.

    Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: an examination of landscape composition and configuration

    Conservation Biology

    (2002)
  • S. Harrison

    Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation

  • D. Hazell

    Frog ecology in modified Australian landscapes: a review

    Wildlife Research

    (2003)
  • S.J. Hecnar

    Acute and chronic toxicity of ammonium nitrate fertilizer to amphibians from southern Ontario

    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

    (1995)
  • S.J. Hecnar et al.

    Regional dynamics and the status of amphibians

    Ecology

    (1996)
  • S.J. Hecnar et al.

    The effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution

    Biological Conservation

    (1997)
  • J.E. Houlahan et al.

    The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition

    Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

    (2003)
  • J.E. Houlahan et al.

    Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines

    Nature

    (2000)
  • P. Kareiva et al.

    Spatial aspects of species interactions: the wedding of models and experiments

  • J.M. Kiesecker et al.

    Complex causes of amphibian population declines

    Nature

    (2001)
  • S.R. Kleeberger et al.

    Post-breeding migration and summer movement of Ambystoma maculatum

    Journal of Herpetology

    (1983)
  • M.G. Knutson et al.

    Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA

    Conservation Biology

    (1999)
  • M.B. Kolozsvary et al.

    Habitat fragmentation and the distribution of amphibians, patch and landscape correlates in farmland

    Canadian Journal of Zoology

    (1999)
  • R. Laan et al.

    Effects of pool size and isolation on amphibian communities

    Biological Conservation

    (1990)
  • Cited by (1086)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text